Fant 858 publikasjoner. Viser side 1 av 36:
The growing adoption of low-cost sensors (LCSs) has significantly enhanced environmental monitoring by enabling widespread, community-driven data collection, particularly in regions requiring dense monitoring, and in regions with limited or no reference instrumentation. Increased public awareness and demand for dense environmental monitoring have resulted in extensive air quality and meteorological datasets from diverse sources. However, the integration of such datasets into regulatory frameworks and large-scale environmental monitoring remains challenging due to persistent issues related to data quality, standardization, and interoperability. To address these challenges, the FILTER (Framework for Improving Low-cost Technology Effectiveness and Reliability) approach developed by Hassani et al. (2025) provides a suite of algorithms to harmonize, quality-check, flag, and perform in-situ corrections on crowdsourced PM2.5 LCS datasets. While FILTER was initially designed and validated for static PM2.5 sensors, it has since been extended to address data quality challenges associated with the dynamics of mobile and wearable sensing. Across both static and mobile LCS platforms, FILTER employs a unified processing pipeline that generates measurement-level quality flags based on multiple statistical tests, to quantify the reliability of each observation. Quality control (QC) includes statistical tests to: (a) assess physical measurement consistency (range validity test), (b) detect flatline behavior (constant value test), and (c) identify abnormal patterns (spatiotemporal outlier detection test) using both historical trends and spatial comparisons with neighboring LCSs. Beyond these mandatory QC steps, more advanced statistical procedures incorporate relative (spatial correlation test) and absolute (spatial similarity test) comparisons with nearby LCSs, higher-quality instruments, and reference monitoring stations. For mobile and wearable sensing, FILTER has been specifically adapted to support pairwise comparisons between mobile sensors and comparisons with higher-accuracy nodes, accounting for operation under dynamic environmental and operational conditions. In this context, statistical comparisons are evaluated during rendezvous events, that is, periods in which the mobile sensor and a higher-accuracy node provide temporally coincident measurements. The modified framework retains the core principles of transparency, scalability, and sensor independence, while introducing additional steps to address motion-related artifacts, intermittent time series, and location-specific uncertainties. FILTER is developed in the open-source R environment. Its modular and hierarchical design allows flexible adaptation of quality control and correction workflows based on data availability, the spatiotemporal characteristics of LCS networks, and application-specific requirements. By improving data reliability and usability, FILTER enables crowdsourced LCS datasets to serve as a reliable complement to official monitoring networks for air quality management, urban- and regional-scale modeling, and policymaking. References Hassani, A., Salamalikis, V., Schneider, P., Stebel, K., and Castell, N.: A scalable framework for harmonizing, standardization, and correcting crowd-sourced low-cost sensor PM2. 5 data across Europe, J. Environ. Manage., 380, 125100, 2025.
2026
Urban nature-based solutions (NBS) are increasingly deployed to restore ecosystems, regulate microclimates, support biodiversity, and enhance wellbeing. Yet many remain short-lived: once installation and early monitoring end, maintenance budgets shrink, responsibilities become unclear, and socio–ecological performance declines. The EU BiodivNBS NatureScape project addresses this overlooked post-implementation phase by examining how NBS are cared for, governed, and experienced over time in seven European cities – Oslo, Dublin, Riga, Milan, Lisbon, Lublin, and St. Gallen.To strengthen long-term sustainability, NatureScape establishes Transformation Labs (T-Labs) at demonstration sites, including rain gardens in Lublin; community gardens in Oslo, Riga, Milan, and St. Gallen; school gardens in Lisbon; and goat-grazing vegetation management in Dublin. These T-Labs function as practice-based innovation spaces where municipal authorities, researchers, and community groups jointly observe socio–ecological dynamics, identify stewardship challenges, and co-develop adaptive responses. The approach extends conventional living labs by focusing on long-term socio–ecological change and governance arrangements that support NBS persistence.NatureScape integrates baseline assessments across five forms of capital (natural, social, human, manufactured, financial) with participatory workshops, PPGIS, citizen science, and systems tools such as causal loop diagrams and multi-criteria assessments. This mixed-methods design enables analysis of NBS as dynamic systems shaped by interactions between ecological conditions, institutions, and community practices.Early findings from Oslo, Riga, Lublin and St. Gallen reveal recurrent barriers: unclear responsibilities after project funding ends, limited resources for routine care and climate adaptation, insecure land tenure, weak alignment with municipal strategies, and uneven community participation. In St. Gallen, expectations to expand activities, actors, or spatial scope further increase complexity and demand stronger management capacities.This study presents the NatureScape framework for post-implementation NBS governance and demonstrates how T-Labs can: (i) shift perceptions of NBS from temporary projects to living infrastructures requiring continuous care; (ii) clarify and redistribute responsibilities and resources for long-term stewardship; and (iii) provide structured settings where new forms of cooperation and valuation can be tested and embedded in policy. Embedding co-maintenance and co-stewardship as core practices can help cities move beyond pilot projects toward durable, multifunctional NBS aligned with EU and global biodiversity frameworks and targets.
2026
This study presents insights from the EU Biodiversa+ NatureScape project (2025–2028). The project offers a new perspective for understanding nature-based solutions (NBS) in cities by focusing on the post-implementation phase, in which environmental justice in urban planning is put to the test.In recent years, cities have increasingly pursued NBS in urban development projects such as community gardens, green roofs, and temporary green spaces to support biodiversity while simultaneously improving human well-being. Despite growing recognition of NBS in urban planning, their potential for cities' socio-ecological transformation remains constrained by overlooked post-implementation challenges. While the planning and implementation of NBS already receive considerable attention, critical dimensions of environmental justice – distributive equity, accessibility, and procedural justice for continuous public participation and stakeholder engagement – become apparent only in the post-implementation phase. This phase is characterized by dynamic interactions between social and ecological components, shaping whether NBS are consolidated and sustained in ways that contribute in the long term to transformative effects and environmental justice, or whether they instead undermine these aims.NatureScape addresses this critical transition and its challenges in urban planning. Through transformation laboratories (T-Labs) in seven cities (Oslo, Dublin, Riga, Milan, Lisbon, Lublin, and St. Gallen), the research team explores two central questions: (1) What enablers and barriers in urban planning shape the post-implementation stewardship of urban NBS? (2) What governance mechanisms, strategies, and measures lead to the successful integration of urban NBS into urban planning to unfold their transformative potential for biodiversity-positive transitions and environmental justice?Initial findings from the T-Labs reveal crucial barriers. The post-implementation phase is often reduced to technical maintenance. Insufficient incorporation of NBS into urban planning is associated with fragmented institutions and responsibilities, weak strategic and instrumental anchoring, financial insecurity, and the erosion of institutional and political support.The project identifies interconnected governance mechanisms that could successfully integrate NBS into urban planning: adaptive planning processes, institutional anchoring that fosters shared ownership among stakeholders, co-management approaches with formal agreements, public planning frameworks, and institutional structures that support integrated action. Together, these mechanisms highlight stewardship as a pivotal principle for achieving just and biodiversity-positive urban futures.
2026
2026
2026
2026
2026
2026
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
Anthropogenic particles in surface waters from Adventfjorden (Svalbard)
The ubiquitous presence of microplastics and other anthropogenic compounds in the marine environment are unfortunately not surprising anymore. Recent publications are revealing the occurrence of those synthesized particles in even remote and/or pristine areas in different marine matrices like biota, water and sediment. Nevertheless, the knowledge about sources and transport mechanisms of those anthropogenic particles (APs) is still lacking, especially in the Arctic. In this study we investigated surface waters from Isfjorden and the branching Adventfjorden, where Longyearbyen the largest settlement of Svalbard is located. Here, untreated wastewater is released into the fjord system. At two sample sites upstream and two sample sites downstream, three replicates at each location have been collected in June 2021. APs larger than <50μm were investigated regarding size, shape, and polymer type via μFTIR spectroscopy. At each sampling station, APs were present. The highest concentration of APs was found upstream and downstream Isfjorden; whereas lower concentrations were found within Adventfjorden, closest to the wastewater outlet. Additives and polypropylene showed the highest frequencies. Besides local sources like the untreated wastewater, freshwater inputs, ship traffic or the northwards long-range transport from the south into the Arctic needs to be considered.
2025
2026
NO-Hur: the fate of a forest in trouble
An update on the carbon gains and losses at Hurdal
2025