Fant 10084 publikasjoner. Viser side 55 av 404:
2009
2018
Testing ethical impact assessment for nano risk governance
Risk governance of nanomaterials and nanotechnologies has been traditionally mainly limited to risk assessment, risk management and life cycle assessment. Recent approaches have experimented with widening the scope and including economic, social, and ethical aspects. This paper reports on tests and stakeholder feedback on fine-tuning the use of ethical impact assessment guidelines (RiskGONE D3.6) and online tools adapting the CEN Workshop Agreement part 2 CWA 17145-2:2017 (E)) to support risk governance of nanomaterials, in the RiskGONE project. The EIA guidelines and tools are intended to be used as one module in a multicriteria decision support framework for risk governance of nanomaterials, but may also be used for a stand-alone ethical impact assessment.
Nanomaterials are new forms of materials with structures at sizes between 1 and 100 nanometres (a millionth of a millimetre). They can be particles, tubes, platelets or other shaped structures. Nanomaterials can be applied in many different products, ranging from medicine to solar panels. Researchers, governments and stakeholders have been concerned with potential risks for human health and the environment for decades. Also, how nanomaterials behave during the production, use and waste processing of the products they are included in has been investigated in Life Cycle Analysis. However, ethical issues which may be raised by the use of nanomaterials in those products are usually not investigated. In this article, the procedure for an ethical impact assessment described in the CEN Workshop Agreement CWA 17145-@:2017 (E) is adapted to nanomaterials. Users who want to perform this assessment are guided through the procedure by online tools. The guidelines and tools were tested on several case studies and discussed with stakeholders, who commented on the criteria which should be used and on who could use the tools. This results in recommendations for improving the guidelines and online tools.
2024
2023
Testing av utslippsfaktorer for vedfyring i AirQUIS. En sensitivitetsstudie for PM2.5 i Oslo. NILU OR
Utslipp fra vedfyring gir et av de største bidragene til partikkelutslipp i Norge, men det er en del usikkerhet rundt utslippstallene og hvor mye vedfyring bidrar til de bakkenære konsentrasjonene. Det er gjort spredningsberegninger for Oslo for å vurdere utslipp fra vedfyring og teste ulike parametere som er knyttet opp mot denne kilden. Det er vært testet for 3 ulike vinterperioder for å se på meteorologisk variasjon (Basisberegninger), med nye utslippsfaktorer fra SINTEF (scenario SINTEF), kraftig kutt i utslippene (scenario Forbruk) og med en ny fordeling av utslippet over døgnet (scenario TID).
Modellen overestimerer klart bidraget fra vedfyring i basisberegningene som inkluderer det største utslippet for vedfyring i denne studien. Selv med bruk av nye utslippsfaktorer fra SINTEF som gir mindre utslipp og som gir et noe bedre resultat enn de tidligere faktorene, er det fortsatt klart at utslippene fra vedfyring gir for høye konsentrasjoner, spesielt på kvelden. I kombinasjon med resultatene fra andre scenarioberegninger vurderer vi det til at utslippene ikke er riktige hverken i mengde eller fordeling i tid og rom.
J.W. Cappelens Forlag AS
2013
Test Centre Mongstad. Spredningsberegninger for utslipp til luft fra Test Centre Mongstad (TCM). NILU OR
2008
Terrestrisk naturovervåking. Persistente organiske miljøgifter i rovfuglegg i Norge. NINA oppdragsmelding, 701
2001
2006
Tenth EIONET workshop on air quality management and assessment, Vilnius, 17-18 November 2005. Proceedings. ETC/ACC Technical paper, 2005/9
2005
2013
2013
2003
2016
2016
2017
Seasonal and interannual variability in surface water partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2) and air‐sea CO2 fluxes from a West Spitsbergen fjord (IsA Station, Adventfjorden) are presented, and the associated driving forces are evaluated. Marine CO2 system data together with temperature, salinity, and nutrients, were collected at the IsA Station between March 2015 and June 2017. The surface waters were undersaturated in pCO2 with respect to atmospheric pCO2 all year round. The effects of biological activity (primary production/respiration) followed by thermal forcing on pCO2 were the most important drivers on a seasonal scale. The ocean was a sink for atmospheric CO2 with annual air‐sea CO2 fluxes of −36 ± 2 and −31 ± 2 g C·m−2·year−1 for 2015–2016 and 2016–2017, respectively, as estimated from the month of April. Waters of an Arctic origin dominated in 2015 and were replaced in 2016 by waters of a transformed Atlantic source. The CO2 uptake rates over the period of Arctic origin waters were significantly higher (2 mmol C·m−2·day−1) than the rates of the Atlantic origin waters of the following year.
2018
2016
2022
2016
2011
2015