Gå til innhold
  • Send

  • Kategori

  • Sorter etter

  • Antall per side

Fant 10456 publikasjoner. Viser side 409 av 419:

Publikasjon  
År  
Kategori

Harmonisation of methane isotope ratio measurements from different laboratories using atmospheric samples

Dasgupta, Bibhasvata; Menoud, Malika; Veen, Carina van der; Levin, Ingeborg; Veidt, Cordelia; Moossen, Heiko; Michel, Sylvia Englund; Sperlich, Peter; Morimoto, Shinji; Fujita, Ryo; Umezawa, Taku; Platt, Stephen Matthew; Zwaaftink, Christine Groot; Myhre, Cathrine Lund; Fisher, Rebecca; Lowry, David; Nisbet, Euan G.; France, James; Maisch, Ceres Woolley; Brailsford, Gordon; Moss, Rowena; Goto, Daisuke; Pandey, Sudhanshu; Houweling, Sander; Warwick, Nicola; Röckmann, Thomas

Abstract. Establishing interlaboratory compatibility among measurements of stable isotope ratios of atmospheric methane (δ13C-CH4 and δD-CH4) is challenging. Significant offsets are common because laboratories have different ties to the VPDB or SMOW-SLAP scales. Umezawa et al. (2018) surveyed numerous comparison efforts for CH4 isotope measurements conducted from 2003 to 2017 and found scale offsets of up to 0.5 ‰ for δ13C-CH4 and 13 ‰ for δD-CH4 between laboratories. This exceeds the World Meteorological Organisation Global Atmospheric Watch (WMO-GAW) network compatibility targets of 0.02 ‰ and 1 ‰ considerably. We employ a method to establish scale offsets between laboratories using their reported CH4 isotope measurements on atmospheric samples. Our study includes data from eight laboratories with experience in high-precision isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) measurements for atmospheric CH4. The analysis relies exclusively on routine atmospheric measurements conducted by these laboratories at high-latitude stations in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, where we assume each measurement represents sufficiently well-mixed air at the latitude for direct comparison. We use two methodologies for interlaboratory comparisons: (I) assessing differences between time-adjacent observation data and (II) smoothing the observed data using polynomial and harmonic functions before comparison. The results of both methods are consistent, and with a few exceptions, the overall average offsets between laboratories align well with those reported by Umezawa et al. (2018). This indicates that interlaboratory offsets remain robust over multi-year periods. The evaluation of routine measurements allows us to calculate the interlaboratory offsets from hundreds, in some cases thousands of measurements. Therefore, the uncertainty in the mean interlaboratory offset is not limited by the analytical error of a single analysis but by real atmospheric variability between the sampling dates and stations. Using the same method, we assess this uncertainty by investigating measurements from four high-latitude sites analysed by the INSTAAR laboratory. After applying the derived interlaboratory offsets, we present a harmonised time series for δ13C-CH4 and δD-CH4 at high northern and southern latitudes, covering the period from 1988 to 2023.

2025

Recent Evolution of Hydrofluorocarbons (HFC) Emissions from East Asia under the Kigali Amendment

Choi, Haklim; Vollmer, Martin K.; Müller, Michelle J.; Kim, Jooil; Thompson, Rona Louise; Choi, Jieun; Muhle, Jens; Reimann, Stefan; Park, Sunyoung

2025

Kobles til flere tidlige dødsfall

Grythe, Henrik (intervjuobjekt); Lien, Marthe Småkasin (journalist)

2025

Spatial and temporal assessment of soil degradation risk in Europe

Afshar, Mehdi H.; Hassani, Amirhossein; Aminzadeh, Milad; Borrelli, Pasquale; Panagos, Panos; Robinson, David A.; Or, Dani; Shokri, Nima

Soil degradation threatens agricultural productivity and ecosystem resilience across Europe, yet spatially consistent assessments of its intensity and drivers remain limited. In this study, we used Soil Degradation Proxy (SDP), that integrates four key indicators of soil degradation, including erosion rate, soil pH, electrical conductivity, and organic carbon content, to quantify soil degradation risk. Using over 38,000 LUCAS topsoil observations and a machine learning model trained on climate, land cover, topographic, soil parent material properties, and spectral variables, we map annual SDP values between years 2000 to 2022 across Europe. Results show soil degradation risk is highest in southern Europe, especially in intensively managed and sparsely vegetated landscapes. Over the past two decades, approximately 7.1% of land area across the EU and the UK has experienced increasing degradation risk (most notably across Eastern Europe), with rainfed croplands emerging as the most affected land cover type. Land cover is the most influential driver, modulating effects of climatic variables such as precipitation and temperature on SDP. This data-driven framework provides a consistent and scalable approach for monitoring soil degradation risk and offers actionable insights to support targeted conservation and EU-wide policy implementation.

2025

Hazard and Life Cycle Assessment of Safe and Sustainable Coatings

Paula, Marcella; Nogueira, António; Ferraz-Caetano, José; Longhin, Eleonora Marta; Murugadoss, Sivakumar; Rundén-Pran, Elise; Dusinska, Maria; Yamani, Naouale El; Verbič, Anja; Stres, Blaž; Novak, Uroš; Likozar, Blaž; Ferreira, Germán

2025

Transboundary particulate matter, photo-oxidants, acidifying and eutrophying components

Fagerli, Hilde; Aas, Elin Cecilie Ristorp; Benedictow, Anna Maria Katarina; Blake, Lewis R.; Caspel, Willem Elias van; Denby, Bruce; Gauss, Michael; Heinesen, Daniel; Klein, Heiko; Lange, Gunnar Felix; Lundin, Thorbjørn; Mousing, Erik Askov; Mortier, Augustin; Nyiri, Agnes; Oliviè, Dirk Jan Leo; Segers, Arjo; Simpson, David; Tsyro, Svetlana; Ulimoen, Magnus; Bustamante, Alvaro Moises Valdebenito; Wind, Peter; Wærsted, Eivind Grøtting; Aas, Wenche; Duflot, Valentin; Hjellbrekke, Anne-Gunn; Platt, Stephen Matthew; Solberg, Sverre; Tørseth, Kjetil; Yttri, Karl Espen; Redeyoff, Oscar; Schindlbacher, Sabine; Ullrich, Bernhard; Wankmüller, Robert; Kieswetter, Gregor; Dedring, Susanna; Lindl, Florian; Heyes, Chris; Plha, Thomas; Kuenen, Jeroen J. P.; Hood, Christina; Vieno, Massimo; Salameh, Therese; Dufresne, Marvin; Jaffrezo, Jean-Luc; Dominutti, Pamela; Uzu, Gaëlle; Conil, Sébastien; Favez, Olivier; Mothes, Falk; Herrmann, Hartmut; Poulain, Laurent; Kasper-Giebl, Anne; Bergmans, Benjamin; Moïs, Eric; Močnik, Griša

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

2025

Langt nede i isen finnes det luft som er flere hundre tusen år gammel

Eckhardt, Sabine; Steen-Larsen, Hans Christian (intervjuobjekter); Aas, Vilde Aardahl (journalist)

2025

Supervised Anomaly Detection in Univariate Time-Series Using 1D Convolutional Siamese Networks

Chatterjee, Ayan; Thambawita, Vajira L B; Riegler, Michael; Halvorsen, Pål

In time-series data analysis, identifying anomalies is crucial for maintaining data integrity and ensuring accurate analyses and decision-making. Anomalies can compromise data quality and operational efficiency. The complexity of time-series data, with its temporal dependencies and potential non-stationarity, makes anomaly detection challenging but essential. Our research introduces ADSiamNet, a 1D Convolutional Neural Network-based Siamese network model for anomaly detection and rectification. ADSiamNet effectively identifies localized patterns in time-series data and smooths detected anomalies using a quantile-based technique. In tests with physical activity data from Actigraph watches and MOX2-5 sensors, ADSiamNet achieved accuracies of 98.65% and 85.0%, respectively, outperforming other supervised anomaly detection methods. The model uses a contrastive loss function to compare input sequences and adjusts network weights iteratively during training to recognize intricate patterns. Additionally, we evaluated various univariate time-series forecasting algorithms on datasets with and without anomalies. Results show that anomaly-smoothed data reduces forecasting errors, highlighting our approach’s effectiveness in enhancing time-series data analysis’s integrity and reliability. Future research will focus on multivariate time-series datasets.

2025

Towards a Holistic Approach in Chemical Exposure Assessment: The ExpoAdvance Roadmap

Lamon, Lara; Paini, Alicia; Doyle, James; Moeller, Ruth; Viegas, Susana; Cubadda, Francesco; Hoet, Peter; Nieuwenhuyse, A. van; Louro, Henriqueta; Dusinska, Maria; Galea, Karen S.; Canham, Rebecca; Martins, Carla; Gama, Ana; Teofilo, Vania; Silva, Maria Joao; Ventura, Celia; Alvito, Paula; Yamani, Naouale El; Ghosh, Manosij; Radu, Duca; Siccardi, Marco; Rundén-Pran, Elise; McNamara, Cronan; Price, Paul

2025

Recent Global Trends in Urban Nitrogen Dioxide Observed from Space

Schneider, Philipp; Hassani, Amirhossein; Walker, Sam-Erik; Solberg, Sverre; Stebel, Kerstin

2025

A worldwide aerosol phenomenology: Elemental and organic carbon in PM2.5 and PM10

Putaud, Jean-Philippe; Cavalli, Fabrizia; Yttri, Karl Espen; Chow, Judith C.; Watson, John G.; Sinha, Baerbel; Venkataraman, Chandra; Ikemori, Fumikazu; Jaffrezo, Jean-Luc; Uzu, Gaelle; Moreno, Isabel; Krejci, Radovan; Laj, Paolo; Gupta, Tarun; Hu, Min; Kim, Sang-Woo; Mayol-Bracero, Olga; Quinn, Patricia; Aas, Wenche; Alastuey, Andres; Andrade, Marcos; Angelucci, Monica; Anurag, Gupta; Beukes, J. Paul; Bhardwaj, Ankur; Chatterjee, Abhijit; Chaudhary, Pooja; Chhangani, Anil Kumar; Conil, Sébastien; Degorska, Anna; Devaliya, Sandeep; Dhandapani, Abisheg; Duhan, Sandeep Singh; Dumka, Umesh Chandra; Habib, Gazala; Hamzavi, Zahra; Haswani, Diksha; Herrmann, Hartmut; Holubova, Adela; Hueglin, Christoph; Imran, Mohd; Jehangir, Arshid; Kapoor, Taveen Singh; Karanasiou, Angeliki; Khaiwal, Ravindra; Kim, Jeongeun; Kolesa, Tanja; Kozakiewicz, Joanna; Kranjc, Irena; Laura, Jitender Singh; Lian, Yang; Liu, Junwen; Manwani, Pooja; Mardoñez-Balderrama, Valeria; Marticorena, Béatrice; Matsuki, Atsushi; Mor, Suman; Mukherjee, Sauryadeep; Murthy, Sadashiva; Muthalagu, Akila; Najar, Tanveer Ahmad; Kumar, Radhakrishnan Naresh; Pandithurai, Govindan; Perez, Noemi; Phairuang, Worradorn; Phuleria, Harish C.; Poulain, Laurent; Prasad, Laxmi; Pullokaran, Delwin; Qadri, Adnan Mateen; Qureshi, Asif; Ramírez, Omar; Roy, Sayantee; Rüdiger, Julian; Saikia, Binoy K.; Saikia, Prasenjit; Sauvage, Stéphane; Savvides, Chrysanthos; Sharma, Renuka; Singh, Tanbir; Singh, Gyanesh Kumar; Spoor, Ronald; Srivastava, Atul Kumar; Raman, Ramya Sunder; Zyl, Pieter G. Van; Vecchiocattivi, Marco; Voiron, Céline; Xin, Jinyuan; Yadav, Kajal

Elemental carbon (EC), organic carbon (OC), and particulate matter (PM) concentrations in the inhalable (PM10) and fine (PM2.5) size fractions are measured worldwide, albeit with different analytical methods. These measurements from many researchers were collected and analyzed for Africa, America, Asia, and Europe for 2012–2019. EC/PM, OC/PM, and OC/EC ratios were examined based on region, site type, and season to infer potential sources and impacts. These analyses demonstrate that carbonaceous materials are important PM constituents throughout the world. Mean EC/PM ratios were lowest in PM10 in Sahelian Africa and Europe (∼0.01), highest (>0.07) in PM2.5 at urban sites in North America, South America, and Japan. Mean OC/PM ratios were lowest in PM10 in the Sahel (∼0.06) and in PM2.5 in China and Thailand (0.10), and highest in central and eastern Europe (∼0.3) and North America (∼0.4). OC/EC ratios were elevated in western and northern Europe, and at regional background sites in North America. EC/PM increased with PM10 in Thailand, while OC/PM increased with higher PM mass in Thailand, India, and North America, highlighting the specific contribution of carbonaceous aerosols to PM pollution in these regions. At European and North American background sites, OC/EC ratios increased with PM mass. Higher OC/EC ratios in dry periods indicate influence of wildfires, prescribed burns, and secondary aerosol formation. Elevated wintertime EC/PM ratios coincide with residential heating in temperate climate zones.

2025

Monitoring of the atmospheric ozone layer and natural ultraviolet radiation. Annual report 2024

Svendby, Tove Marit; Fjæraa, Ann Mari; Schulze, Dorothea; Bäcklund, Are; Johnsen, Bjørn

This report summarizes the results from the Norwegian monitoring programme on stratospheric ozone and UV radiation measurements. The ozone layer has been measured at three locations since 1979: In Oslo/Kjeller, Tromsø/Andøya and Ny-Ålesund. The UV measurements started in 1995. The results show that there was a significant decrease in stratospheric ozone above Norway between 1979 and 1997. After that, the ozone layer stabilized at a level ~2% below pre-1980 level. The year 2024 was characterized by high total ozone values most of the year, especially in the Arctic stations in March. For Ny-Ålesund, 2024 showed the highest annual average total ozone value since systematic ground-based ozone measurements started in 1997.

NILU

2025

Hvorfor er det tusenvis av kjemikalier i plast?

Spilde, Ingrid Sandtorv, Alexander Harald; Wagner, Martin; Herzke, Dorte (intervjuobjekter)

2025

How reliable are seasonal forecasts of snow?

Vorobeva, Ekaterina; Orsolini, Yvan

2025

Jordkloden skinner svakere enn før

Muri, Helene; Myhre, Gunnar (intervjuobjekter); Remåd, Annika (journalist)

2025

Quantifying the Potential of Digital Innovations to Advance Circular Economy in Consumer and Industrial Goods

Boero, Riccardo; Hernandez, Miguel Las Heras; Bouman, Evert; Guerreiro, Cristina

2025

MIKRONOR 2024 Monitoring of microplastics and tyre wear particles in the Norwegian environment

Alling, Vanja Karin Gunilla; Lund, Espen; Lusher, Amy L.; Rødland, Elisabeth Strandbråten; Knight, Jemmima; Schmidt, Natascha; Herzke, Dorte; Pakhomova, Svetlana; Hjelset, Sverre; Consolaro, Chiara; Collard, France; Gjeitnes, Mari; Galtung, Kristin; Snekkevik, Vilde Kloster

The 2024 MIKRONOR campaign, coordinated by NIVA and NILU on behalf of the Norwegian Environment Agency, signifcantly expanded the national monitoring framework for microplastics (MPs) to encompass diverse environmental compartments, including surface waters (Oslofjord and Lake Mjøsa), urban runoff, marine sediments, atmospheric deposition, and coastal beach sediments. Urban stormwater runoff was identifed as a predominant source of MPs, particularly tyre wear particles (TWP). Sediment samples from stormwater traps in Oslo exhibited high TWP concentrations up to 240 mg/g, constituting approximately 25% of the total sediment mass. Corresponding runoff water samples revealed MP concentrations as high as 733 ± 142 particles/L, indicating substantial episodic fuxes of MPs into receiving aquatic or marine systems. Inner Oslofjord sediments contained 0.6–3.5 % TWP by mass, confrming the high levels found in 2023. Microplastic concentrations in surface waters were generally low, ranging from 0 to 0.6 MP/m³. However, two hydrodynamic accumulation zones within the Oslofjord exhibited anomalously high concentrations, with levels approximately two orders of magnitude greater than outside the accumulation zones. One net tow recovered >7,000 fragments of expanded polystyrene, highlighting localized retention. Atmospheric deposition peaked in urban Sofenbergparken (1514 µg/m²/d; 68 % TWP) and showed a clear urban-to-remote gradient. Beach sediments at Akerøya remained low in MPs, with most samples below detection limits. The findings highlight urban runoff, especially TWP, as a dominant source to the Oslofjord, and reveal critical hotspots in both water and air pathways.

Norsk institutt for vannforskning (NIVA)

2025

Task Offloading Optimization for UAV-Aided NOMA Networks With Coexistence of Near-Field and Far-Field Communications

Bui, Tinh Thanh; Do, Thinh Quang; Huynh, Dang Van; Do-Duy, Tan; Nguyen, Long D.; Cao, Tuan-Vu; Sharma, Vishal; Duong, Trung Q.

2025

Stress management with HRV following AI, semantic ontology, genetic algorithm and tree explainer

Chatterjee, Ayan; Riegler, Michael Alexander; Ganesh, K.; Halvorsen, Pål

Heart Rate Variability (HRV) serves as a vital marker of stress levels, with lower HRV indicating higher stress. It measures the variation in the time between heartbeats and offers insights into health. Artificial intelligence (AI) research aims to use HRV data for accurate stress level classification, aiding early detection and well-being approaches. This study’s objective is to create a semantic model of HRV features in a knowledge graph and develop an accurate, reliable, explainable, and ethical AI model for predictive HRV analysis. The SWELL-KW dataset, containing labeled HRV data for stress conditions, is examined. Various techniques like feature selection and dimensionality reduction are explored to improve classification accuracy while minimizing bias. Different machine learning (ML) algorithms, including traditional and ensemble methods, are employed for analyzing both imbalanced and balanced HRV datasets. To address imbalances, various data formats and oversampling techniques such as SMOTE and ADASYN are experimented with. Additionally, a Tree-Explainer, specifically SHAP, is used to interpret and explain the models’ classifications. The combination of genetic algorithm-based feature selection and classification using a Random Forest Classifier yields effective results for both imbalanced and balanced datasets, especially in analyzing non-linear HRV features. These optimized features play a crucial role in developing a stress management system within a Semantic framework. Introducing domain ontology enhances data representation and knowledge acquisition. The consistency and reliability of the Ontology model are assessed using Hermit reasoners, with reasoning time as a performance measure. HRV serves as a significant indicator of stress, offering insights into its correlation with mental well-being. While HRV is non-invasive, its interpretation must integrate other stress assessments for a holistic understanding of an individual’s stress response. Monitoring HRV can help evaluate stress management strategies and interventions, aiding individuals in maintaining well-being.

2025

Addressing the advantages and limitations of using Aethalometer data to determine the optimal absorption Ångström exponents (AAEs) values for eBC source apportionment

Savadkoohi, Marjan; Gerras, Mohamed; Favez, Olivier; Petit, Jean-Eudes; Rovira, Jordi; Chen, Gang I.; Via, Marta; Platt, Stephen Matthew; Aurela, Minna; Chazeau, Benjamin; Brito, Joel F. De; Riffault, Véronique; Eleftheriadis, Kostas; Flentje, Harald; Gysel-Beer, Martin; Hueglin, Christoph; Rigler, Martin; Gregorič, Asta; Ivančič, Matic; Keernik, Hannes; Maasikmets, Marek; Liakakou, Eleni; Stavroulas, Iasonas; Luoma, Krista; Marchand, Nicolas; Mihalopoulos, Nikos; Petäjä, Tuukka; Prévôt, André S.H.; Daellenbach, Kaspar R.; Vodička, Petr; Timonen, Hilkka; Tobler, Anna; Vasilescu, Jeni; Dandocsi, Andrei; Mbengue, Saliou; Vratolis, Stergios; Zografou, Olga; Chauvigné, Aurélien; Hopke, Philip K.; Querol, Xavier; Alastuey, Andrés; Pandolfi, Marco

The apportionment of equivalent black carbon (eBC) to combustion sources from liquid fuels (mainly fossil; eBCLF) and solid fuels (mainly non-fossil; eBCSF) is commonly performed using data from Aethalometer instruments (AE approach). This study evaluates the feasibility of using AE data to determine the absorption Ångström exponents (AAEs) for liquid fuels (AAELF) and solid fuels (AAESF), which are fundamental parameters in the AE approach. AAEs were derived from Aethalometer data as the fit in a logarithmic space of the six absorption coefficients (470–950 nm) versus the corresponding wavelengths. The findings indicate that AAELF can be robustly determined as the 1st percentile (PC1) of AAE values from fits with R2 > 0.99. This R2-filtering was necessary to remove extremely low and noisy-driven AAE values commonly observed under clean atmospheric conditions (i.e., low absorption coefficients). Conversely, AAESF can be obtained from the 99th percentile (PC99) of unfiltered AAE values. To optimize the signal from solid fuel sources, winter data should be used to calculate PC99, whereas summer data should be employed for calculating PC1 to maximize the signal from liquid fuel sources. The derived PC1 (AAELF) and PC99 (AAESF) values ranged from 0.79 to 1.08, and 1.45 to 1.84, respectively. The AAESF values were further compared with those constrained using the signal at mass-to-charge 60 (m/z 60), a tracer for fresh biomass combustion, measured using aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) and aerosol mass spectrometry (AMS) instruments deployed at 16 sites. Overall, the AAESF values obtained from the two methods showed strong agreement, with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.78. However, uncertainties in both approaches may vary due to site-specific sources, and in certain environments, such as traffic-dominated sites, neither approach may be fully applicable.

2025

Publikasjon
År
Kategori