Gå til innhold
  • Send

  • Kategori

  • Sorter etter

  • Antall per side

Fant 9758 publikasjoner. Viser side 316 av 391:

Publikasjon  
År  
Kategori

Comparison of four inverse modelling systems applied to the estimation of HFC-125, HFC-134a, and SF6 emissions over Europe.

Brunner, D.; Arnold, T.; Henne, S.; Manning, A.; Thompson, R. L.; Maione, M.; O'Doherty, S.; Reimann, S.

2017

Comparison of five eulerian air pollution forecasting systems for the summer of 1999 using the German ozone monitoring data.

Tilmes, S.; Brandt, J.; Flatøy, F.; Bergstrom, R.; Flemming, J.; Langner, J.; Christensen, J.H.; Frohn, L.M.; Hov, Ø.; Jacobsen, I.; Reimer, E.; Stern, R.; Zimmermann, J.

2002

Comparison of five eulerian air pollution forecasting systems for the summer of 1999 using the German ozone monitoring data.

Tilmes, S.; Brandt, J.; Flatøy, F.; Bergstrom, R.; Flemming, J.; Langner, J.; Christensen, J.H.; Frohn, L.M.; Hov, Ø.; Jacobsen, I.; Reimer, E.; Stern, R.; Zimmermann, J.

2002

Comparison of dust-layer heights from active and passive satellite sensors

Kylling, Arve; Vandenbussche, Sophie; Capelle, Virginie; Cuesta, Juan; Klüser, Lars; Lelli, Luca; Popp, Thomas; Stebel, Kerstin; Veefkind, Pepijn

Aerosol-layer height is essential for understanding the impact of aerosols on the climate system. As part of the European Space Agency Aerosol_cci project, aerosol-layer height as derived from passive thermal and solar satellite sensors measurements have been compared with aerosol-layer heights estimated from CALIOP measurements. The Aerosol_cci project targeted dust-type aerosol for this study. This ensures relatively unambiguous aerosol identification by the CALIOP processing chain. Dust-layer height was estimated from thermal IASI measurements using four different algorithms (from BIRA-IASB, DLR, LMD, LISA) and from solar GOME-2 (KNMI) and SCIAMACHY (IUP) measurements. Due to differences in overpass time of the various satellites, a trajectory model was used to move the CALIOP-derived dust heights in space and time to the IASI, GOME-2 and SCIAMACHY dust height pixels. It is not possible to construct a unique dust-layer height from the CALIOP data. Thus two CALIOP-derived layer heights were used: the cumulative extinction height defined as the height where the CALIOP extinction column is half of the total extinction column, and the geometric mean height, which is defined as the geometrical mean of the top and bottom heights of the dust layer. In statistical average over all IASI data there is a general tendency to a positive bias of 0.5–0.8 km against CALIOP extinction-weighted height for three of the four algorithms assessed, while the fourth algorithm has almost no bias. When comparing geometric mean height there is a shift of −0.5 km for all algorithms (getting close to zero for the three algorithms and turning negative for the fourth). The standard deviation of all algorithms is quite similar and ranges between 1.0 and 1.3 km. When looking at different conditions (day, night, land, ocean), there is more detail in variabilities (e.g. all algorithms overestimate more at night than during the day). For the solar sensors it is found that on average SCIAMACHY data are lower by −1.097 km (−0.961 km) compared to the CALIOP geometric mean (cumulative extinction) height, and GOME-2 data are lower by −1.393 km (−0.818 km).

2018

Comparison of data for ozone amounts and UV doses obtained from simultaneous measurements with various standard UV instruments. Proceedings of SPIE, 5156

Dahlback, A.; Eide, H.A.; Høiskar, B.A.K.; Olsen, R.; Schmidlin, F.J.; Tsay, S.-C.; Stamnes, K.H.

2003

Comparison of data assimilation methods for assessing PM10 exceedances on the European scale. NATO science for peace and security series

Denby, B.; Schaap, M.; Segers, A.; Builtjes, P.; Horálek, J.

2008

Comparison of columnar aerosol properties between the Arctic and sub-Arctic stations Hornsund (77N, 16E) and Alomar (69N, 16E).

Rodríguez, E.; Cachorro, V.; Toledano, C.; De Frutos, A.; Sobolewski, P.; Gausa, M.; Stebel, K.; Holben, B.; Kszyscin, J.

2008

Comparison of CH4 emissions reported in UNFCCC inventories against atmospheric inversions

Tzompa-Sosa, Zitely A.; Deng, Zhu; Ciais, Philippe; Saunois, Marielle; Qiu, Chunjing; Tan, Chang; Sun, Taochun; Ke, Piyu; Tanaka, Katsumasa; Lin, Xin; Thompson, Rona Louise; Tian, Hanqin; Yao, Yuanzhi; Huang, Yuanyuan; Lauerwald, Ronny; Jain, Atul K.; Xu, Xiaoming; Bastos, Ana; Sitch, Stephen; Palmer, Paul I.; Lauvaux, Thomas; d'Aspremont, Alexandre; Giron, Clément; Benoit, Antoine; Poulter, Benjamin; Chang, Jinfeng; Petrescu, Ana Maria Roxana; Davis, Steven J.; Liu, Zhu; Grassi, Giacomo; Albergel, Clement; Chevallier, Frederic

2021

Comparison of Atmospheric Microplastic in remote and urban locations in Norway; occurence, composition and sources

Herzke, Dorte; Schmidt, Natascha; Schulze, Dorothea; Eckhardt, Sabine; Evangeliou, Nikolaos

2024

Comparison of anthropogenic and natural emissions of mercury. NILU F

Pacyna, J.M.; Pacyna, E.G.; Banel, A.; Sundseth, K.

2013

Comparison of air quality and public perception data collected within Citizens' Observatories tools for Citi-sense project studies in Belgrade and Oslo.

Jovaševic-Stojanovic, M.; Castell, N.; Topalovic, D.; Davidovic, M.; Schneider, P.; Lazovic, I.; Liu, H.-Y.; Bartonova, A.

2016

Comparison of a new emission inventory for the Nordic countries and global inventories

Paunu, V.-V.; Karvosenoja, N.; Segersson, D.; Lopez-Aparicio, Susana; Nielsen, O. K.; Plejdrup, M. S.; Vo, Dam Thanh; Thorsteinsson, T.; Johansson, L.; Kupiainen, K.; van der Gon, H. Denier; Brandt, J.; Geels, C.

2018

Comparison between the Arctic and Sub-Arctic (77ºN, 16ºE) and ALOMAR (69ºN, 16ºE). NILU PP

Rodriguez, E.; Cachorro, V.; Toledano, C.; De Frutos, A.; Sobolewski, P.; Stebel, K.; Holben, B.; Kszyscin, J.

2008

Comparing National Greenhouse Gas Budgets Reported in UNFCCC Inventories against Atmospheric Inversions

Deng, Zhu; Ciais, Philippe; Tzompa-Sosa, Zitely A.; Saunois, Marielle; Qiu, Chunjing; Tan, Chang; Sun, Taochun; Ke, Piyu; Cui, Yanan; Tanaka, Katsumasa; Lin, Xin; Thompson, Rona Louise; Tian, Hanqin; Yao, Yuanzhi; Huang, Yuanyuan; Lauerwald, Ronny; Jain, Atul K.; Xu, Xiaoming; Bastos, Ana; Sitch, Stephen; Palmer, Paul I.; Lauvaux, Thomas; d'Aspremont, Alexandre; Giron, Clément; Benoit, Antoine; Poulter, Benjamin; Chang, Jinfeng; Petrescu, Ana Maria Roxana; Davis, Steven J.; Liu, Zhu; Grassi, Giacomo; Albergel, Clement; Chevallier, Frederic

2021

Comparing national greenhouse gas budgets reported in UNFCCC inventories against atmospheric inversions

Deng, Zhu; Ciais, Philippe; Tzompa-Sosa, Zitely A.; Saunois, Marielle; Qiu, Chunjing; Tan, Chang; Sun, Taochun; Ke, Piyu; Cui, Yanan; Tanaka, Katsumasa; Lin, Xin; Thompson, Rona Louise; Tian, Hanqin; Yao, Yuanzhi; Huang, Yuanyuan; Lauerwald, Ronny; Jain, Atul K.; Xu, Xiaoming; Bastos, Ana; Palmer, Paul I.; Lauvaux, Thomas; d'Aspremont, Alexandre; Giron, Clément; Benoit, Antoine; Poulter, Benjamin; Chang, Jinfeng; Petrescu, Ana Maria Roxana; Davis, Steven J; Liu, Zhu; Grassi, Giacomo; Albergel, Clement; Tubiello, Francesco N. ; Perugini, Lucia; Peters, Wouter; Chevallier, Frederic

In support of the global stocktake of the Paris Agreement on climate change, this study presents a comprehensive framework to process the results of an ensemble of atmospheric inversions in order to make their net ecosystem exchange (NEE) carbon dioxide (CO2) flux suitable for evaluating national greenhouse gas inventories (NGHGIs) submitted by countries to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). From inversions we also deduced anthropogenic methane (CH4) emissions regrouped into fossil and agriculture and waste emissions, as well as anthropogenic nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. To compare inversion results with national reports, we compiled a new global harmonized database of emissions and removals from periodical UNFCCC inventories by Annex I countries, and from sporadic and less detailed emissions reports by non-Annex I countries, given by national communications and biennial update reports. No gap filling was applied. The method to reconcile inversions with inventories is applied to selected large countries covering ∼90 % of the global land carbon uptake for CO2 and top emitters of CH4 and N2O. Our method uses results from an ensemble of global inversions produced by the Global Carbon Project for the three greenhouse gases, with ancillary data. We examine the role of CO2 fluxes caused by lateral transfer processes from rivers and from trade in crop and wood products and the role of carbon uptake in unmanaged lands, both not accounted for by NGHGIs. Here we show that, despite a large spread across the inversions, the median of available inversion models points to a larger terrestrial carbon sink than inventories over temperate countries or groups of countries of the Northern Hemisphere like Russia, Canada and the European Union. For CH4, we find good consistency between the inversions assimilating only data from the global in situ network and those using satellite CH4 retrievals and a tendency for inversions to diagnose higher CH4 emission estimates than reported by NGHGIs. In particular, oil- and gas-extracting countries in central Asia and the Persian Gulf region tend to systematically report lower emissions compared to those estimated by inversions. For N2O, inversions tend to produce higher anthropogenic emissions than inventories for tropical countries, even when attempting to consider only managed land emissions. In the inventories of many non-Annex I countries, this can be tentatively attributed to a lack of reporting indirect N2O emissions from atmospheric deposition and from leaching to rivers, to the existence of natural sources intertwined with managed lands, or to an underestimation of N2O emission factors for direct agricultural soil emissions. Inversions provide insights into seasonal and interannual greenhouse gas fluxes anomalies, e.g., during extreme events such as drought or abnormal fire episodes, whereas inventory methods are established to estimate trends and multi-annual changes. As a much denser sampling of atmospheric CO2 and CH4 concentrations by different satellites coordinated into a global constellation is expected in the coming years, the methodology proposed here to compare inversion results with inventory reports (e.g., NGHGIs) could be applied regularly for monitoring the effectiveness of mitigation policy and progress by countries to meet the objective of their pledges. The dataset constructed by this study is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5089799 (Deng et al., 2021).

2022

Comparing GOSAT observations of localized CO2 enhancements by large emitters with inventory-based estimates.

Janardanan, R.; Maksyutov, S.; Oda, T.; Saito, M.; Kaiser, J.W.; Ganshin, A.; Stohl, A.; Matsunaga, T.; Yoshida, Y.; Yokota, T.

2016

Publikasjon
År
Kategori